:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/the-nicotine-patch-2825025_FINAL-09eeaa3f1bef40cc9e413a9382d28bd5.png "cigarette filter uses Who Made That Cigarette Filter?")
![PDF] The use of charcoal in modified cigarette filters for mainstream smoke carbonyl reduction](https://figures.semanticscholar.org/b5e59aac27f206dd20f3343df4b93e9e8c9644da/4-Figure2-1.png "PDF] The use of charcoal in modified cigarette filters for mainstream smoke carbonyl reduction")
★★★★★ 2
This book made me angry
Format: Paperback
I was excited about this book. Many law-related blogs and forums highly recommended this book. It's a "must read" for law students, they said.
I was angry when I read the introduction. I was angrier when I began reading the chapters. What happened to brevity? Law students are already swamped with course readings. Why write a book intended to be read by law students in such a long and voluminous way? Much of the text can be removed.
"Get to the point," I found myself telling the author as I read page after page. I hated it. It is the rare law student who will pick up this book for its narrative value. The typical law student will pick this book for its value on navigating through law school exams, not for its story-telling. Yet that student will be left disappointed.
I wish the author would have considered writing a "Get to the Point" book, which would serve as a shorter version of 'Getting to Maybe.' Perhaps it is not too late. "Get to the Point" could serve as an alternative or accompanying version, maybe? I ask that the author considers this.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 2, 2025
